As Shares Sink To New Lows, Embittered Facebook Investors Ponder Their Next Move — Some Blame Themselves For Getting Caught Up In the Hype and Cut Their Losses By Selling Low, While Others Blame Facebook, Morgan Stanley or NASDAQ

To say that Facebook‘s debut as a public company was bungled is something like saying Facebook is a website you might have heard of — either way, a colossal understatement. The response from small-time investors has been equal parts frustration, confusion and bitterness. Fed up, some are dumping their shares and accepting the losses. Others, while miffed, are holding on and hoping to ride the stock’s eventual success. Some blame themselves for embracing the hype over a company whose underlying value likely didn’t merit the price at which it went public. But many accuse Facebook and its underwriting banks of setting the price too high and for trying to sell too many shares. Others are pointing fingers at the NASDAQ stock market for botching buy and sell orders on opening day. Or they’re angry over brokers who pushed them to buy. And others are irked over reports that Morgan Stanley, which guided Facebook through its public debut, told only some select clients of an analyst’s negative report about Facebook before its stock began trading May 18 — the underwriting banks were expected to set shares at the highest price they thought the market would bear, but investors have also come to expect that an initial share price will be low enough so the stock can climb on the first day, when interest typically peaks. "With a good IPO, the investment banks leave room for the pop," said Michael Hines, a social media consultant who decided to cut his losses and sell his shares. "They didn’t do that in this case," he added, an AP news release reports. Indeed, U.S. companies that have gone public this year have returned an average of 16 percent on their first day, according to Renaissance Capital — and since going public, those companies are up an average 13 percent. Morgan Stanley disputes allegations that it put its own profit ahead of investor concerns. "We have clearly put clients’ interests first by correcting pricing on some trades that were mispriced because of trading glitches beyond our control," the company said in a statement, the AP release reports.

Looking back, some individual investors say they recognize that Facebook’s initial $38 stock price was too lofty. It was more than 80 times the company’s 2011 earnings per share. The average for companies in the Standard & Poor’s 500 index is far cheaper, about 19 times earnings, reports the news release by AP writer Christina Rexrode.

Before Facebook’s public debut, some investors were considering what to do if the stock price doubled the first day. Instead, it closed a paltry 23 cents higher. It tumbled $7.23 the next two days. A week later, it still hasn’t begun to recover. It closed Friday at 31.91, down 3.4 percent on the day and 16 percent below its initial price. One problem was that first-day trading glitches on the NASDAQ stock exchange botched some investors’ trades. And in lawsuits, Morgan Stanley is accused of sharing negative analyst reports about the company with a few favored clients. Such allegations reinforce suspicions that Wall Street is stacked against the small investor. Investors have filed lawsuits, and lawmakers are opening inquiries, according to the AP report.

PR Biz Update PR Agency News PR People Marketing Trends
Ben Gibson, data information, data monitoring, data risk, data value, governance practices, information governance, low-value data, Marketing, Pr, Public relations, sensitive data, Veritas Technologies, ‘store-everything’ mentality
Information Governance: Why You Must Continuously Evaluate the Worth and Risk of Information by Regularly Monitoring Data

A whopping 94% of companies have a formal information governance program...

dependence on digital channels, digital techniques, email fundraising, fundraising campaigns, Marketing, Marks Paneth, Michael McNee, nonprofit leaders, Pr, Public relations, supporter communications, traditional mail campaigns
Nonprofit Marketing in a Digital Landscape: Email Campaigns are Poor Replacements for Traditional Mail, Leaders Say

Despite their cost advantages, email fundraising campaigns aren’t delivering the needed...

Carolyn Lukensmeyer, Civility in America, Generation Z, KRC Research, Leslie Gaines-Ross, Marketing, National Institute for Civil Discourse, online incivility, Pam Jenkins, Powell Tate, Pr, Public relations, social media trends, Weber Shandwick
Gunslinging On the Wild Web: Gen Z Points to Internet, Social Media as Main Sources of Incivility, Weber Finds

88 Percent of 15-18 Year Olds Have Personally Experienced Incivility Online...

Thought Leaders On Deadline
Dmitry Dragilev, effective pitching, getting press, JustReachOut, Marketing, Media Relations, pitching insights, pitching journalists, Pr, PR team, PR tips for startups, Public relations, startup PR
PR Tips for Startups: 7-Step Proven System to Get Press

By Dmitry Dragilev, Founder, JustReachOut Having worked in the PR industry...

always-on clients, Courtney Lukitsch, Emotional intelligence, Emotional Intelligence 2.0, EQ, Gotham PR, Marketing, performance recognition, Pr, PR industry, PR profession, Public relations, relationship management, workplace culture
Harvesting Emotional Intelligence in Public Relations: PR = EQ

By Courtney Lukitsch, Founder and Principal, Gotham PR Given the wildly...

Customer experience, Customer service, customer service red flags, customer’s-eye view, Joseph A. Michelli, Marketing, Pr, Public relations, service experience, service overhaul, social media strategy
Does Your Company Need a Service Overhaul? Eight Red Flags That Demand Action

In the spotlight: Joseph A. Michelli, Author, “Driven to Delight: Delivering...