Chick-fil-A's Crisis in Reverse: After Shifting Its Corporate-Donations Course Last Week and Deciding to Avoid Involvement In Social Issues, Chain Now Risks Alienating the Audience That Staunchly Defended Its Original Position

A new controversy has landed Chick-fil-A once again in the PR fryer. A Chicago politician’s statement the fast food chain was no longer giving to groups that oppose same-sex marriage has reportedly angered the Christian conservatives who supported Chick-fil-A this summer when its president reaffirmed his opposition to gay marriage. Civil rights groups hailed last week’s change of heart, even though the company never actually confirmed it — instead, it released two public statements, neither of which made Chick-fil-A’s position any clearer.

The events suggest the franchise may be trying to steer clear of hot-button social issues while it expands in less conservative regions of the country. In its statement, the company said its corporate giving had for many months been mischaracterized, the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal reports.

"Part of our corporate commitment is to be responsible stewards of all that God has entrusted to us," the statement said. "Chick-fil-A’s giving heritage is focused on programs that educate youth, strengthen families and enrich marriages, and support communities. We will continue to focus our giving in those areas. Our intent is not to support political or social agendas." The three-page statement did not say whether that included gay marriages.

The company’s response, its second in as many days, was posted on its website after Chicago Alderman Joe Moreno announced the alleged policy change. Moreno said the change followed extended negotiations, and as a result, he would no longer try to block a Chick-fil-A restaurant from opening in his district.

Social networking sites lit up following Moreno’s remarks, with many people saying Chick-fil-A had caved to pressure from gay rights organizations. University of Georgia marketing professor Sundar Bharadwaj said the company is risking alienating its customers.

"You can change your position, but you have to have a rational reason for the change and be consistent and communicate that to your customers," he said, the Avalanche-Journal reports. "Two different brands cannot be visible to the customer. Your authenticity is questioned after that, and your brand loses equity."

We've updated our Privacy Policy. Read the updated policy →

PR Biz Update PR Agency News PR People Marketing Trends
Customer Retention
4 Out of 5 B2B Companies Invest Less Than 30 Percent of Their Marketing Budget on Customer Retention Messaging

Historically, it takes fewer resources to maintain existing customers as it...

scientific calculator and pens
Procurement in 2017: CPOs Focus on Cost Cutting, Risk Management in Volatile Market, with Tech & Talent Top of Mind

In an uncertain global market, reducing costs is the biggest priority...

woman with shopping bags over yellow lights background
Most Memorable Brand Experiences: New Report Ranks the Top Retailers for Customer Service Excellence

Study Also Ranks Retailers on Most Accessible Website Help Destinations These...

Thought Leaders On Deadline
Mark Simon
PR Best Practices: 5 Ways to Communicate Smarter in 2017

By Mark Simon, Managing Director of North American and Toluna Digital,...

Steve Beale
Reporters Love Trendspotters: Make Your Pitch Bigger by Linking to One—or Pointing a New One Out

By Steve Beale, Daily ‘Dog Media News Editor and Inside Health Media Editor...

Pr, Marketing, Public relations, Social Engagement, PR campaign, PR Measurement, campaign measurement, campaign effectiveness, brand mentions, Taral Patel, PRmention, campaign impact, keyword rankings, social shares
10 Methods to Measure the Impact of PR Campaign

By Taral Patel, PR Executive, PRmention Whenever a company runs a PR...

<-- Google Analytics -->