June 8, 2012
Bloomberg's "Big Drink" Ban in Context: Survey Finds Most People Know "Sugary Drinks" Contribute to Obesity and Want to Consume Less — Many Think Drink Companies Unfairly Target Young Children and Minorities with Marketing
A new survey led by Interlex Communications, in partnership with the Yale Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity and the Center for Science in the Public Interest, reveals that consumers know "sugary drinks" are not part of a healthy diet — but many are still confused about what constitutes a "sugary drink." The national effort, which surveyed 1,894 adults across seven demographic groups, revealed that the majority of respondents (more than 50 percent of each) would like to reduce the amount of sugary drinks consumed. However, nearly half of respondents who identified as Caucasian and Republican said that they would not like to reduce their intake (46.5 percent and 48.8 percent respectively). The survey also tested responses to various messages and found that 57 percent of respondents agreed that sugary drink companies contribute to high rates of obesity in the U.S. Additionally, 53 percent of respondents felt that sugary drink companies influenced elected officials when they make campaign contributions. One of the most revealing findings is that 51 percent of respondents felt sugary drink companies unfairly target youth and minorities. "This report's findings are critical as they, for the first time, show the consumer's perspective and attitudes on 'sugary drink' marketing and messaging. It is critical for us to understand how these messages impact and resonate with the consumer in our efforts to educate them about healthier options," said Rudy Ruiz, president and CEO of Interlex Communications, Inc., in a news release. The survey also found that only 11 percent of respondents believed "sugary drink" companies cared about their health — a telling insight on the perception of "sugary drink" companies.
In addition to the survey, four focus groups identified critical qualitative data about respondents' perception of 'sugary drinks'. The most notable finding includes the positive lens through which 'sugary drinks' are perceived, as many participants used the terms energy, relaxed, comfortable and friends to describe them. Additionally, many respondents expressed that drinking 'sugary drinks' was all-American culture.




Comments
Agenda-Driven Study
I don't doubt the validity of the responses here, but the study was clearly structured to advance an anti-beverage industry agenda. When the name of your organization is "Yale Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity," we already know you're coming at it with an axe to grind. So people like surgary drinks. Companies market sugary drinks. People know that too much is unhealthy. Where's the news? More importantly, where is the justification to regulate? Can't people be trusted to make their own lifestyle choices? So companies market to kids. That's what parents are for. Kids don't have their own money. Parents are the checks and balances. The government needs to stay out, and PR people who buy into the "if it's bad for you, the government needs to step in," should be careful. Last I heard, just about everything we do is bad for us, depending on which study you believe.
Post new comment