Follow Us!

SEARCH
Bookmark and Share
 
Issue Date: Daily 'Dog - February 9, 2010


Et Tu Toyota? Iconic Automaker's Downfall Offers Tough PR Lessons
Bill McKibben By W.T. "Bill" McKibben, Senior Partner, Ethics Practice, The Great Lakes Group

Reputation Management Rule #1: When something bad—large or small—comes to light relating to your organization, alert the media, put it up on your website, put it out on Twitter and all the other social media; disclose it before an outsider hits you with it. Do not listen to your legal department; do not worry about how it happened, or who is at fault; instantly move to make it right. Do the right thing!

A second iconic organization fell victim to what happens when reputation gets shoved to the back of the bus, or in this case the backseat of perhaps the most admired automobile company in the world, Toyota.

Johnson & Johnson led the dumb response parade. They ignored a foul odor emanating from J&J consumer products ranging from Tylenol to Rolaids and St. Joseph Aspirin. After delaying a recall for a ridiculously long period of time, they came out with the lamest excuse ever. Somehow, a preservative chemical banned in the United States had found its way into their wooden shipping pallets and then through multiple layers of cardboard and plastic and into their products. Even if true, so what! If your products stink, recall them, think of the customer. At least no one seems to have been seriously harmed by the stinky J&J pills. Upset tummies and other intestinal problems seem to be the worst of it.

Not so in Toyota's case. It appears that an uncontrolled acceleration problem resulted in several serious automobile accidents. If the reports are true, people were injured and killed. Back in 2002, when the problem first surfaced, Toyota said it was driver error. More recently, they claimed it was connected to an improperly installed floor mat. It turns out that while they were talking driver error and floor mats, they suspected all along that they had problems with the electronic throttle control system used in a wide range of Toyota models. Now they have been forced to recall millions of cars, shutter factories and advise their dealers to stop selling some of their most popular models.

Let's go back to Rule #1. What if Toyota had jumped on this problem right away? Electronic throttle controls were probably not that widely in use six or seven years ago. It would have cost them a lot of money and thrown a monkey wrench into a promising technology. But it would have preserved their reputation and the trust of their worldwide customer base.

Instead, they now face perhaps the most costly recall in history. One analyst in Japan estimates that this issue will take over—wait for it— "a billion dollars a month off Toyota's bottom line." That, however, is peanuts in comparison to the long-term loss of reputation and trust that Toyota will suffer.

It's crushing to have two great companies stumble; they will pay the price for many years to come. Hopefully, others out there will observe and learn.

Reach W. T. "Bill" McKibben at WT@McKibben.com. His website is www.Ethics-Guru.com, and his blog is http://ethics-central.blogspot.com/.

Comments:
Tuesday, February 09, 2010 7:49:32 AM by Anonymous
I agree with you points but ignoring legal is tougher to do than say. Any tips for how to best align with your legal team?
Tuesday, February 09, 2010 10:02:24 AM by Anonymous
THE CHOICE: THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION OR A COURT OF LAW.
Tuesday, February 09, 2010 10:10:13 AM by kj@jotorp.com
This is so true. What baffles me is that a company like Toyota did not have a Crisis Management Plan already in place - but had to hire a PR firm after the fact to strategize how to help their image - valuable time wasted while news of the debacle kept ruining their reputation.
Tuesday, February 09, 2010 1:42:04 PM by W.T. "Bill" McKibben
It's all too easy to allow your legal team to delay and destroy your chances to preserve your reputation. Look at the HP Board mess, their legal counsel not only turned a bad situation worse, he got some of them (including himself) into legal hot water. Bausch & Lomb virtually destroyed their company.

In his autobiography, Confessions of an SOB, former Gannett CEO and founder of USA Today, Allen Neuharth, lays out this position perfectly, “Hire the best lawyers you can find, but never allow them to make a decision.”

The "Barracuda Bar" is going to be all over you no matter what you do what do you think is going to look best to a jury, doing the right thing like J&J in Chicago, or hiding behind a legal smokescreen?

W.T. "Bill" McKibben
Tuesday, February 09, 2010 5:46:39 PM by Roberta Guise
I agree wholeheartedly with your suggestions. Remember how Odwalla responded a few years ago when word surfaced of a death from one of its juices? They immediately started a public conversation and this was before Twitter, YouTube, etc.

With a crisis communications plan in place, a company can do the right thing for its public without missing a beat, emphasis on the right thing.

Roberta Guise
Guise Marketing & PR

Leave your comment
 
Daily 'Dog Reader Anonymous
 
Name 
Website 
Please note that comments are not automatically posted. The editors review all comments before posting, and they check the replies throughout the day. Please allow up to 2 hours for your comment to appear.
CAPTCHA Validation
Retype the code from the picture
CAPTCHA Code Image
Speak the code Change the code
 
PR Spotlight

BurrellesLuce's Johna Burke interviews Steve Mayerowitz, ABC Travel Producer, who discusses how social media has changed how broadcasters process inquiries and requests from PR people.


















Leading Edge
















PR University

Free White Paper Library
Read up on the latest ideas and technologies from top companies in the PR industry.
Click here to view the free white paper library




















Home | Contact Us | About Us | Privacy Policy | Advertise With Us

© 2010. Infocom Group. All Rights Reserved.